Why Keith Olbermann’s Assault On Tony Dungy Is TERRIBLE for the LGBT Cause (Opinion)

Foxnews and conservative media outlets are regularly eviscerated for their biased coverage and/or their views on social issues, with homosexuality being at the forefront.

Some of this criticism is definitely valid, but it is also important to call out those who do the same thing on the other side.

Keith Olbermann is a prime example. MSNBC is basically the liberal version of Foxnews, and Olbermann is the liberal Bill O’Reilly.

On his show last night, he called former Colts coach Tony Dungy the “World’s Worst in Sports” because of comments he made about Michael Sam recently. Here’s Olbermann’s segment:

He starts off trying to make Dungy look like a hypocrite by pointing out that in February, Dungy said the NFL draft was, at the end of the day, based on merit.

It is not hypocritical for him to say that he wouldn’t have drafted Sam because he, “didn’t want to deal with all of it,” if he were still a coach.

As a coach, you do a risk-reward evaluation of any potential draft prospect. Unfortunately, the reality of our society is that drafting an openly gay player brings a lot of controversy, even if 95% of it is created by the media (if you don’t the media will try to divide the Rams locker room by asking the players all kinds of questions in search of a controversial headline, you’re delusional).

If Michael Sam was a once in a lifetime talent, that media circus might be well worth it. But he’s an undersized defensive lineman and a poor tackler, whose average quickness and athleticism doesn’t quite make up for his lack of size.

Michael Sam's combine grade
Michael Sam’s combine grade. Click to enlarge

Why do you think Tim Tebow isn’t in the NFL right now? Because his talent wasn’t enough to make up for the media circus that inevitably followed him around everywhere.

As Dungy said though, “…guys who produce and play well will be welcome in the league.” If Sam turns out to be a solid player, I don’t think Dungy would have had any problem picking him up in a few years after he had proven himself at the pro level.

Olbermann then calls out Dungy for supporting a ban on gay marriage in Indiana. Dungy has always admitted to being guided by his Christianity so this shouldn’t surprise anyone.

But him stating his support for a same-sex marriage ban seven years ago really isn’t relevant to the discussion of whether or not he would have drafted Sam today.

Every coach in the league, whether they were Tea Party Conservatives or bleeding-heart liberals, took into account the fact that Sam would bring with him a media circus and potential issues in the locker room.

Joanthon VIlma was one of a number of players who admitted being uncomfortable with the idea of playing with Sam: “Imagine if he’s the guy next to me, and you know, I get dressed, naked, taking a shower, the whole nine, and it just so happens he looks at me, how am I supposed to respond?” (from an interview with NFL Network)

Why? Because regardless as to how the coach feels, there are 52 other players in that locker room, many of whom may have a serious issue with Sam’s lifestyle. Whether or not you agree with their views on homosexuality, that’s the reality of the league right now, and it’s foolish to act like we shouldn’t take that into account.

Olbermann then calls out Dungy for volunteering to be Michael Vick’s mentor after he finished his sentence for dog-fighting. Two things here.

Firstly, Dungy wasn’t coaching, so he didn’t have to take into account the distractions that Vick’s history would bring. Are we really going to sit here and attack him for helping Vick reinvent himself and his image?

If Dungy was coaching, I’m sure he would have taken more time to think about the decision of putting Vick on his team. Which brings me to my second point: Vick’s potential rewards were much higher than Sam’s.

Michael Vick led the Eagles to the playoffs in 2010 with an impressive season that earned him a spot in the Pro-Bowl

Vick was a perennial all-star and was regularly among the league’s top quarterbacks when he was arrested on the dog-fighting charges. It made a lot more sense for a team (like the Eagles) to take a risk on him than it does for a team to take a big risk on the unproven Michael Sam (which is why he wasn’t drafted until the 7th round).

It’s also worth noting that while Vick’s dog-fighting is clearly much worse than Sam’s gayness, it is less likely to create issues in the locker room. Again, that’s messed up, but that’s reality.

Olbermann saves the worst for last, insinuating that Dungy is a bigot because he had to deal with similar discrimination as a black player, coach and broadcaster throughout his years working with the NFL.

Standing up for your values is always a noble thing to do. But we also have to realistic. Dungy knew this when he was passed over for head coaching positions in the late 80s and early 90s in favor of less qualified candidates.

But he also understood the reality of the situation. He understood that calling out the racial bigotry of NFL owners when it came to hiring coaches would only hurt his chances of becoming a head coach himself.

It was this combination of self-confidence and realism that allowed him to become the first black coach to win a Super Bowl in 2007. Now, he has the platform to speak out and actually affect real change in terms of racial discrimination in the NFL.

Dungy hoists the Bill Lombardi trophy after the Colts’ 2007 Super Bowl victory

The point is this: attacking somebody for being homophobic when they are clearly just being realistic is not only unfair, it makes that person less open-minded about homosexuality and less willing to discuss it.

People like Olbermann use this fake homophobia because they know it will get people riled up, the same way people like O’Reilly use issues like gun control or censorship of religion in schools on Foxnews.

I’m all for gay marriage and equality, but if we really want people to be more accepting of homosexuality, we have to put them in a position where they feel comfortable talking about it candidly. Pulling out the pitchforks on your politically-charged “news” segment to get more viewers is doing more damage than anything.

So to Keith Olbermann: stop taking advantage of people’s emotions and trying to put yourself on the moral high ground. Then, just maybe, I’ll consider listening to what you have to say.


4 thoughts on “Why Keith Olbermann’s Assault On Tony Dungy Is TERRIBLE for the LGBT Cause (Opinion)”

  1. This article is right on point and could not have been stated better in my opinion.
    I wish I could just highlight the last 3 paragraphs of your article because they state the exact reason that I will not watch Fox News or MSNBC. It frustrates be beyond belief that I work with people who rely 100% on Fox News to get their “Information”, when anyone who is even reasonably smart realizes that Fox reports with the intent of getting repeated viewers.
    The best way to get viewers to watch your show is by stirring their emotions and unfortunately the strongest emotion to preach to is hatred. When people who may normally be more “middle of the road” in their beliefs focus solely on MSNBC or Fox News they are pushed to the left or the right and gain a sense of animosity towards people who’s views are different. This is because O’Reilly and Olbermann are largely irresponsible in the way they report the news.
    This is why I come back to your website most of the time I see an article on my wall. Though there are times I have been able to sense your political stance, I feel that you present facts in an extremely responsible manner.

    1. I love reading stuff like this! It was that very same realization about how our information is being presented to us these days that really motivated me to create a media source that is as unbiased as possible and that admits its bias when doing opinion/analysis. I’m glad you enjoyed this piece and honored that you consider us to be one of your more trusted sources of info. Thanks for the extra motivation today!

  2. Once again you’ve managed to create an article that stems incurring veracity. Anyone who follows Tony Dungy’s career knows he is a man with strong christian values, I read his book “Quiet Strength” which transcended my discernment of him drastically, he went from someone who I only knew as a head football coach to a remote mentor in a matter of pages. With that being said each player, coach, GM, or owner can substantiate Olbermann’s alleged homophobic comments directed towards Dungy are inaccurate and undeserved. Dungy has a reputable image across the league and his sentiment in the Michael Sam situation is merely what just about all players, coaches, GM, and owners feel. Thankfully he had the guts to say it and not have any contrite behind them.

    1. glad you enjoyed my friend! olbermann is either totally clueless about pro football or he’s just willing to ignore all of the stuff i brought up to make his argument seem more solid. i honestly feel bad for Michael Sam himself- i’m sure he has a lot of respect for Dungy and doesn’t want olbermann up there trying to fight fights that even Sam himself thinks are ridiculous.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s